Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: polyForth multitasker question Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 18:05:54 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <87fuhh8425.fsf@nightsong.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="304fe6faaa9227b6d8739ba7e8be15b2"; logging-data="26331"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18y6DOpG2K0ggJE4oX+3//h" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iCz+QlFrWGpVXm7h4TKryHNz5gw= sha1:4CWIIX3ylkINyuyBh54nf+ijr8o= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:56959 "Elizabeth D. Rather" writes: > In many applications, there's nothing wrong with letting the > multitasker spin when nothing's going on, because in a PC, for > example, it doesn't cost any extra power. PC's nowadays use a lot more power when the cpu is busy. If something gets caught in a loop on my laptop, I can tell that it happens because the laptop fan turns on. With my old laptop, if I ran something compute-intensive, the laptop itself would start to smell bad after a while, as heat buildup caused internal adhesives and stuff to off-gas. See also: https://xkcd.com/1172/