Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: OKAD? Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 01:15:26 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: <87bmzqew2p.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> References: <6b82df58-8ef8-4280-b783-ca8729155422@googlegroups.com> <1fe82f27-e99d-4809-901a-49c80650c6dd@googlegroups.com> <87lgz0k8jh.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <679aed09-f763-4072-893b-9421e121a204@googlegroups.com> <8db49be3-e9e5-4247-a4ef-425b11efa623@googlegroups.com> <87lgywg6mb.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <20160913000101.46c106d8@HP-6550b> <20160914085017.6648817c@HP-6550b> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="590ea01354cf4bcbcd857d7ebbd88128"; logging-data="32117"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/p0nopiFk58LQoEp9Wi9ZP" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fduzAs+/DdcBUwO5ovGWXaV8fT8= sha1:kszjWoYr79sd22GY5P8mlojwKcg= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:50961 Jan Coombs writes: > Probably this is what was done in the S40C18. What interested > me is where the asynchronous boundaries are. They could be > just around each processor, or maybe the processor logic is > further divided into asynchronous sections. > Hence my question above, "So what is it?" I believe each core is clocked by a ring oscillator local to that core.