Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: High level language for writing Forth Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:41:09 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <87a87ber7e.fsf@nightsong.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="efdb76e8249dce14a596c997ec8f2e8c"; logging-data="5224"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192ra/V/Vbevinqtq2FXEcl" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mBQohVti77w0h9UUaZtKOuG9+ho= sha1:Pg8QzfJGyc4yMYs+cTwdE8ibk+Y= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:57626 Cecil Bayona writes: > Only the Forth VM is written is C or Go or something else, the bulk > would be written in Forth itself to also make it easy to move to > another CPU. You might look at Retroforth: http://retroforth.org/docs/ It's written in about the way you describe.