Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Unfeasible?
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 00:11:16 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <874mfxe2mz.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <n3q89d$9d1$1@dont-email.me> <c6fdaf42-c21b-48ca-a847-c28d757639da@googlegroups.com> <87r3j3dlxc.fsf@nightsong.com> <313aca34-5010-4add-91ae-ca23920bc417@googlegroups.com> <87bna5eaux.fsf@nightsong.com> <864ac9a3-3712-4028-bbfa-fdfd20e2465d@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="560a36ee31cc4bcf69e115b311f0cc5c"; logging-data="14770"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BajLDAr8+kwNBQ9TC7Rwh"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jFyjOeJqRCZWLplIdguQzWuzkLc= sha1:7QeNmAl6HvdvVPBfoLO2h7JVv2E=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:44077

Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> writes:
> O_APPEND :-)

I don't see how that prevents simultaneous instances from interfering.

> I'm surprised you didn't recommend Redis or memcached.

You said it had to be a cgi, which I took to mean long-running processes
weren't allowed and all the state had to be in the file system.
Otherwise, yes, redis would handle this nicely.