Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now?
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:27:12 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <874m5mi6en.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com>
References: <840cddee-749a-4aab-9644-4cfe42371840@googlegroups.com> <nr1aj9$bho$1@dont-email.me> <bc36f094-c73f-4887-976c-6ce0fdfdefd6@googlegroups.com> <87h99mj1qx.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nr37r8$664$1@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="590ea01354cf4bcbcd857d7ebbd88128"; logging-data="1191"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TKYaRbPK7uiS8TmaanQrl"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OzC+VIn0maxEW/nVHfeTbK9RqDA= sha1:uPaI3GF23XVk0rz9CmIQNZz5ELo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:50860

albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) writes:
> Of course there was a working Forth. It was one of the FIG-Forth targets.
> Not only that, it is a very decent processor for Forth.

Oh cool.  For some reason I thought 1802 systems (I never used one) had
a very limited amount of memory, like 2k.  But I see on Wikipedia that
the 1802 had a 16-bit address space.  How much ram were 1802 Forth
systems typically configured with, if anyone knows?