Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Dictionary separated from code ... PROS and CONs
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:40:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <8737n2cxnv.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com>
References: <3d8511c7-8cbf-4ef5-bdc3-eb33c5399d42@googlegroups.com> <weSdnZmlaO_A0gzKnZ2dnUU7-fvNnZ2d@supernews.com> <1310374b-be2c-4cd8-ae3e-b9f206c9fe60@googlegroups.com> <nmrpii$ksl$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="52eac348160ce62b68e4635eee7cc854"; logging-data="22390"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dhlpYvzf8NgW6tMjyjdAN"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eV9lW6D+cWIVUTyCNd2DlqAnsRM= sha1:4nwOd55GbPYCS2f4IzGD4zTjp5M=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:49297

Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> writes:
> its easy to see that in the future writing to the code area will be
> prohibited

No I don't think it will be prohibited in the forseeable future.  Too
much code depends on JIT compilers.