Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Brinkhoff Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Would ?EXIT work in all ANS-Forth systems? Organization: nocrew References: <13e6c647-fd9a-4d77-89e3-2cc977f3bd5b@googlegroups.com> <1cca60ee-6f98-443d-8466-d7efbea8724f@googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 07:13:14 +0200 Message-ID: <86inl266tx.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WmZSoKMcN6LJ36JQDWfwqtOJm9I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.18.91.250 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=a4IoHNXT?EgOHBD=iT>F;gYSB=nbEKnkk:02ZWQ`i[jdnY:6X7^ZBNgI57e>YZ9SOk1HBfORCSCccD5J_h8H;EFcI2Ic:1WDKBc X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:59248 HAA wrote: > It expresses a functionality which at the time was implemented through > R> DROP. For all I know ANS TC simply forgot to consider this use in > its deliberations. Isn't it the case that the 1994 ANS explicitly spells out that return addresses may not be accessible at all by R>?