Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Brinkhoff Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Native Gforth Organization: nocrew References: <622db793-14c4-48e5-a732-686c0b759db5@googlegroups.com> <2016May19.170745@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2016May20.144448@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <75mdnU18NrINvqLKnZ2dnUU7-N_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <2016May20.170203@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:37:04 +0200 Message-ID: <86fuswcd0v.fsf_-_@molnjunk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:m35HUg9izTbv6c3hrHpEUOWMrnM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.18.91.250 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=dF?H@Nf=_n1BJ>9D\7GIO9YSB=nbEKnk;O^UP@kC2k\1nY:6X7^ZBN7I57e>YZ9SO;1HBfORCSCc3D5J_h8H;EF3TkMTf0?THY1 X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:47719 Bernd Paysan wrote: > That's why the first two targets for Gforth with native code > compilation will be arm64 and amd64 So native code compilation on the official roadmap for Gforth? Is it actively being worked on? > The good thing is that a relatively small compiler already provides a > significant improvement in performance compared to the GCC version Is this compiler available somewhere?