Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.eclipse.net.uk!news.eclipse.net.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 14:35:33 -0500
From: David Hume <David.Hume@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Umm...help?
References: <92ff2102-54de-4289-b298-29f92c60f7f8@googlegroups.com>
X-No-Archive: Yes
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 20:35:33 +0100
Message-ID: <7zk3a172wq.fsf@example.com>
Organization: Linux Private Site
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xk9lMVz1T9fejUaCmTQEXIlXFoU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 15
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.168.48.70
X-Trace: sv3-RywNSStKy7rSoXQ2lOOXpWBiSILJ/R1qyS2NohUGY2E0N0rkY+MU81BrwG7hzwylXSX51KAgdT1agNM!x6AcAAEqX6iK75EQsUDpRF7c5sOls716ia9aPrIthZ0v9WgWvjr6gkJy5TTlDlVc3Ps=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1641
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:30089

David J <skamolex@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm the most recent person in the world to learn FORTH.  (Yay!) One
> question I have not found an answer to is this: How do I review the
> current definitions of words I've created?  I realize there are
> endless FORTH implementations.  I'm using something that purports to
> be FIG_FORTHish.
>
> (I'm just presuming there IS some way to review definitions.  The
> alternative seems almost intractable.)

In gforth you can use SEE. However doing that in swiftforth output a
disassembly of the word, which was fascinating, but not quite what you
want.