Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: EXIT THEN
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 19:25:40 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <20170217192540.2e9034f4@_>
References: <o5jrct$1r41$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a9ea4e7a-ae2e-4922-b69d-d5fe10ca33da@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ZTD62cW/Uw8bymX5ok+0NA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:54947

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:40:49 -0800 (PST)
Heinrich Hohl <hheinrich.hohl@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think EXIT-THEN would be the best name. Because this is exactly
> what it does.
> 
> I would of course never use it because I already have EXIT and THEN
> separately.

ENDIF ?
THEXIT ?
FI ?

I posit that QUIT is truly the best name for it.  Unfortunately, QUIT
has historical usage.


Rod Pemberton
-- 
All it takes for humanity to conquer the world's toughest problems
is to hope, to believe, to share, and to do, in cooperation.