Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rod Pemberton Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: TO implementation Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:42:35 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 19 Message-ID: <20170126224235.4455c904@_> References: <9ec202ed-8f32-4b76-b1a2-3cfaafbed507@googlegroups.com> <2017Jan8.162730@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2017Jan9.192014@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2017Jan15.161523@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20170115221901.6a57e261@_> <2017Jan19.122645@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20170119204949.1f41c0ee@_> <09fcb1a6-6d5b-4d0d-b22b-e2498229966d@googlegroups.com> <2017Jan20.132002@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:54448 On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:20:02 GMT anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote: > No, none of these words calls STATE; that would serve no useful > purpose, This is how I see it. Is STATE required by ANS to be implemented? Yes. Is STATE required by ANS to be set during compilation? Yes. Does the example you posted compile a word? Yes. Does the example you posted use and set STATE as required? No. Rod Pemberton