Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rod Pemberton Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Ideal Stack Machine Instruction Set Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 21:40:50 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 20 Message-ID: <20170101214050.6f0fbba6@_> References: <9ec202ed-8f32-4b76-b1a2-3cfaafbed507@googlegroups.com> <1a0be1fe-8615-4b13-a748-81bf6411db04@googlegroups.com> <039e51f5-1854-414e-b863-6119f8925b62@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:53652 On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:01:44 -0800 (PST) hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote: > Why do you want to write a Forth system in C++ or C or any other > language? My take on that is: 1) easier than assembly 2) code is portable 3) code survives longer 4) compiler optimizations 5) foreign function interfaces 6) powerful tool chain 7) more programmers ... Rod Pemberton