Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rod Pemberton Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Yet another language ( was Yet another draw of rectangle) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:15:36 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 82 Message-ID: <20161129231536.47f8e58e@_> References: <6755c77f-2dd0-43cc-af59-91ea3449dbbc@googlegroups.com> <14a2bc75-d574-4103-b6fa-5ff0fedfc63a@googlegroups.com> <87polpbrw3.fsf@nightsong.com> <87r3649c25.fsf@nightsong.com> <2c1337f8-05f8-43e9-8094-e8c015d00ccf@googlegroups.com> <87mvgrandj.fsf@nightsong.com> <42f2d0ba-a1bc-41b6-bc35-50a065bf0f9d@googlegroups.com> <20161129004209.27f63172@_> <174ac180-8e6d-4a6a-ac36-003287a47540@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:52974 On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:18:28 -0800 (PST) hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote: [OT, yet another attempt to infuse Hugh with some reason] > I marked Rod Pemberton's post as spam so it won't appear under Google > Groups. > Well, it seems that a few someones did me a favor then, as you'll need to remark it as spam, yet again ... I guess we won't be hearing from you for a few days, since you'll be involved in "spam" flag war on Google Groups? LOL. Hugh, I truly don't care if you mark it as spam on Google Groups, as someone only needs to click on GG "spam" messages to read them. But, I really don't know why you'd be marking Usenet messages as spam on Google Groups. That seems like a pointless waste of your time, much like your incessant rants and personal attacks on the most active of those who post to comp.lang.forth. But, only you can decide to keep on attacking windmills. Most who read c.l.f. are likely actually reading and posting to Usenet from Usenet, not Google Groups. FYI, for the past few years, someone was marking _ALL_ of your posts as spam on Google Groups. No, it wasn't me. Personally, I still think that you're still "butt hurt" that no serious Forth programmers here happen to like your "novice" Forth package, or that they keep pointing out the flaws it has. I don't think you should take this personally, as I assume they would "help" to "fix" my Forth as well, should it ever be released. Someone has to keep Forth standards high, you just happened to be earlier in line ... > Rod Pemberton is a troll promoting C on comp.lang.forth (also > comp.lang.asm.x86 and alt.lang.asm) and likely other forums FYI, a troll would not be skilled in x86 assembly and C, nor would said troll be implementing a Forth interpreter, which passes much of Hayes Core. I'm just expressing my perspective and programming experience in full, so as to share it with others. I think it has value, just a others here do about their experiences. This is no different than many who post here, including Ms. Rather, Rick "rickman" C., Paul Rubin, Anton Ertl, Bernd Paysan, Hugh Aguilar (yes, even you...), and many others, but to a far lesser extent. Yes, I know that not everyone will accept my experience as theirs. Yes, I understand that they share competing perspectives, which can only be rebutted via alternate experiences of their own. Does that mean such perspectives shouldn't be shared? Some would call that censorship or suppression. Who gave you that right? c.l.f. is not moderated. Of course, you could call all of those people above whom I mentioned trolls too, as Bernd goes off on microprocessors and history, rickman on micro-processors, Rubin on C, Ms. Rather on Forth history, etc. So, who are you really barking at on this troll thing, Hugh? Are you preaching to the choir ... of trolls? > > Again, not the experience of those who have actually written one or > > more Forth applications. > > And here we have our idiot responding to the Rod Pemberton post. Well, we apparently have more than one, whom you would classify as such. Perhaps, they don't give a damn anymore about your perspective, given that you incessantly attack them, or won't stop with your rather hostile variant of pro-Forth, yet anti-Forth establishment, rants? Since no one seems to share your perspectives, I'm assuming that you truly appear to be insane to almost everyone here. > Elizabeth Rather has never written even one Forth application. > [...] I'm sure you'd argue that your statement is or was the truth. But, how is that even remotely related to Forth programming? Does simply mentioning "Forth" in a sentence while attacking someone now constitute "on-topic" behavior for c.l.f.? If a troll is defined as one who posts "off-topic" stuff with an attempt to incite others into arguments for their amusement, then your rants, personal attacks, and demonification of Forth standards, are Troll behavior. How could they be received as anything but that? IIRC, there have been about half a dozen people who've called you out as such. Rod Pemberton