Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:16:29 -0500 From: Chris Hinsley Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 23:16:29 +0100 Message-ID: <2012100823162984153-chrishinsley@gmailcom> References: <76fe0697-97b3-4844-9b18-b2b86e028d8c@googlegroups.com> <971ca4fc-0ec5-457b-b941-c268c2cc48fe@z8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <2012100820430026080-chrishinsley@gmailcom> <2012100821052179545-chrishinsley@gmailcom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Your next supercomputer! Just $99 for 16 ARM cores on a chip. (link supplied) User-Agent: Unison/2.1.9 Lines: 45 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-bbxBxZ2Kn9AuW2nyHYKdJPMZ8iO/KtRtpAKbAdFs6Q+zmglka2f8nT66Ut5GITC9QngntFbHOafEZxw!6ZBsa1wj46bHm8B9ZBuIQMBTKVjoH1M0uYlJ+f0egrUL4opNuBJaAcjfBBmJ4TK8RSs= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2832 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:16076 On 2012-10-08 20:40:23 +0000, rickman said: > On 10/8/2012 4:05 PM, Chris Hinsley wrote: >> On 2012-10-08 20:00:22 +0000, rickman said: >> >>> On 10/8/2012 3:43 PM, Chris Hinsley wrote: >>>> >>>> Wish it had a bit more local memory, but yep, it looks quite nice. >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>> >>> WTF?!!! This thing has more memory on each processor than the GA144 >>> has in total! >>> >>> Rick >> >> :) >> >> Well I do like the idea of having a system like 64 super T800 trams on a >> single chip… call me old fationed but I liked the 1MB tram cards... >> >> Chris > > I don't remember the name of the company, but someone was supposed to > be working on a combined processor/memory which was more like a memory > chip with an embedded processor than a processor with memory. Once > they do that, there is no reason why it couldn't be an array of > processors. > > Personally I never quite got the hang of Transputers. I did work with > them for a while though. Not sure if the system ever got built. It > was for a spook agency. Massively parallel. The software people felt > the need to implement a full blown networking scheme on the links. I'm > not sure how well that worked. > > Rick Loved Transputers, the more the better. Very simple to wire up and use. Taos ran very well on them, was nice having a PC with 30 T800s in my bedroom to play with ! Ah, thoses we're the days… didn't need extra heating in that room on chilly nights… :) Chris