Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: The C Containers library
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 01:22:57 -0800
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <lny4ei6pla.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <n11san$o70$1@dont-email.me> <n129pr$ngg$1@news.albasani.net> <ln7fm2936r.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <j9cb3blp59qmkohk6om16mi500it638286@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="17354"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kA8LPcNrnkFFkdBqLmonT"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ey+g6/RL8wb43xntOjVPs89sWiQ= sha1:yIevhDZrtgTgvCdEqL1XGM2Mmp4=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:74527

Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> writes:
[...]
>>
>>>                         Has probably UB (return missing).
>>
>>If you're referring to the lack of a return statement at the end of
>>main(), that's not an issue.  In C++ (as in C starting with C90),
>>reaching the closing "}" of main() does an implicit `return 0;`.
>
>
> Was that a change in C90?  In C89 falling off the end of main was
> legal, but the value returned to the system was not defined.  C99
> defined the return value in that case to be zero.

Sorry, that was a typo.  I meant C99.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"