Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: What is C? Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:57:53 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <830c4de1-bf1c-4526-8adb-b61f06a9f3c8@googlegroups.com> <5e8f29de-6f41-41ce-a4bf-4ed255c1eb9d@googlegroups.com> <98a66d88-55de-4f30-9444-db6445a415f3@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="40ab068b728f196ddeb1bab8be39060a"; logging-data="26572"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pqPtwc2btB13Mz0jtPXeX" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:d/I7IzvJuJTm5tcMJhQTjivi1ZE= sha1:YrywXuq6mykz1UUH0zZ7ZU2Ejr4= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:108823 David Kleinecke writes: [...] > The (my copy of C89) uses the word "sum" but never defines "sum". One > cannot appeal to the "ordinary language meaning of sum" because a > computer does not do that for some cases. One certainly can appeal to the English meaning of "sum". The standard clearly specifies the cases in which the result of "+" is something else, or is undefined. In other cases, common sense suffices. I suppose it could have defined it in a way that explicitly specifies that 2 + 2 yields 4, but it hardly seems necessary. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"