Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: usecases of void foo(char **b) {} Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:10:00 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <87eg2pedkx.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87wpghcu23.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <877f8gx44n.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <6c5b4a41-3116-4fe9-86a2-97ba4aed856c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e43f89eff67778d2e2548cd041b513fe"; logging-data="15168"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fyjifeAF435xhEVrsMld1" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JKMBlR2+uM5SRQYqMlskT9XtZ4c= sha1:TJuzndgIccFybAVCCz4l1cpy9Qc= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:96094 BartC writes: > On 08/11/2016 15:02, John Bode wrote: [...] >> We simply choose to work with >> the language as it is, learn its rules, learn where it's dangerous, and >> write reasonably safe and understandable code within its constraints. > > Apart from the people who went on to create Objective C, C#, C++, Java...? Yes. The creators of those languages didn't change C itself; they created their own languages that they liked better. I don't see them whining here. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"