Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: while loop vs do while loop reading from the file issue
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:54:55 -0800
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <lnwpdyloq8.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <52f1c174-6af1-4fda-9ff8-a5e2cf507b5f@googlegroups.com> <o2repr$uqa$1@dont-email.me> <87poku5ism.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <o2sfa2$nk5$1@dont-email.me> <e9c94e27-fe02-47b7-a5f0-9918629dfd48@googlegroups.com> <o2tnkp$uf1$1@dont-email.me> <b3e99481-11dd-4c1c-a902-c3801aa173e4@googlegroups.com> <8760ml5v5k.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <37e325fb-4aa8-4c84-9bcd-c1aa790fadc7@googlegroups.com> <87zijw3cfs.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <e67e45a0-8f62-4d17-9719-f3e6275a089c@googlegroups.com> <lnzijvkbz5.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <10e036fc-93fb-4d99-ba8f-1bbd16448b8c@googlegroups.com> <lneg17k44t.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <74cef61a-e3aa-4162-a9c7-22a89af0ce46@googlegroups.com> <58591225.764390@news.xs4all.nl> <428e33b4-36db-47f6-95a8-b86e9cba819a@googlegroups.com> <kfneg0qwlfs.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <b9478ce8-5425-4524-b8d3-a0dd5cd414f3@googlegroups.com> <kfnfuknqm25.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <ddde21e7-7b6e-41aa-baca-340dad0aced4@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5af804fde095f0102ceb1f5e23093854"; logging-data="32712"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+g6EtYMNe1trrOQne4OJsw"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s8GcU1XGF2mOrWar/ZAYq/lhCY8= sha1:kmMYZKzD+8CENR68lAmAUMBQkwo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:101653

Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
> On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 10:41:29 AM UTC, Tim Rentsch wrote:
[...]
>> IMO you would be well advised to pay more attention to what other
>> people are saying, rather than insisting on imparting your own
>> world view - no matter how strongly or subconsciously you might
>> believe it - on what are basically unimportant questions of
>> terminology.
>>
> Loop and a half is your invention.

No, it certainly is not.  I suggest you feed the phrase "loop and a
half" to the search engine of your choice.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"