Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: GCC vs Clang Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:06:44 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="6413"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WGJ9Va3s0W/expyvGlfaf" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:v8wzCqsPjJMr8VBBBfmcrNdcUDQ= sha1:93w2340OuLwvNoq7K87qL1073g8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:92097 BartC writes: > On 10/08/2016 19:49, Keith Thompson wrote: >> BartC writes: >> Has it not occurred to you that there might be a better place to >> find out? http://clang.llvm.org/ is likely to be a good starting >> point. > > I've looked at some of it. The documentation is poor. It thinks people > have an interest in LLVM and the rest, or building from scratch; they > haven't! > > They just want another C compiler to install for Windows as an > alternative to the rest, and one that is ready to use. > > But clang as provided isn't that. Fine, but they haven't bothered to > point that out anywhere, leaving it to users to waste time finding these > things out for themselves. > > I think it took me a couple of years to find out, as it was silently > piggy-backing itself onto my mingw installation! I believe I mentioned the mailing lists. One of them would probably be a good place to discuss the difficulties of installing clang on Windows. [...] -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"