Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Sort char array
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 09:05:16 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <lnpnj8v8w3.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <STKlF.8551$oU2.5908@fx21.iad> <3mRlF.745330$vW4.322977@fx24.am4> <mIRlF.37434$hB2.11570@fx42.iad> <ZO%lF.761092$RU2.112478@fx21.am4> <87ftk7nwlx.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <5i3mF.952079$aI7.587046@fx22.am4> <87a7afnmiq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <bM6mF.762635$RU2.15388@fx21.am4> <8636g5ap5m.fsf@linuxsc.com> <ENomF.2651438$c8w1.2143048@fx08.am4> <ln8spxwt12.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <L5smF.695441$VT3.152510@fx19.am4> <OnvmF.779760$RU2.307870@fx21.am4> <lnzhidv1ie.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <e2c6fd6e-be6b-4320-b4ce-09f574f40fd2@googlegroups.com> <n0EmF.2667134$c8w1.1556251@fx08.am4> <qnf3p8$cng$1@dont-email.me> <laFmF.798865$Nw3.166890@fx40.am4> <qnfa1e$fgv$1@dont-email.me> <FSHmF.756187$bv6.594065@fx04.am4>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="33e1e3aceb314569dcc7078913938d07"; logging-data="620"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18igLfctPSV6s3DdWc6SDjm"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s5F8ujJfjJFOp2MgGwG72ln/OOA= sha1:elxV8+ZnajWc8gaPgCBUJRkcbUw=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:146697

Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]
> It is just a different point of view from yours; that doesn't mean it is 
> not valid.

You should try applying that idea to what the rest of us are saying.

You've made it obvious that you don't care about standard conformance.
That's OK.  You've also made it obvious that you hold anyone who does
care about standard conformance in contempt.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */