Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Using == operator Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:05:33 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4598b1a6-e647-4327-85d8-23f83198d0c6@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="167f7d05f22907ea8e3985ed50c4ed73"; logging-data="9414"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187t5SCbp3hFqiFwEfH4SIg" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:b0ztoOe01JyBeF2bshEwWEakLIA= sha1:yjCqo7TGaf7nkauT82D0pON0wow= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:101053 Malcolm McLean writes: > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 10:06:27 PM UTC, Keith Thompson wrote: >> >> Even if we assume that that corresponds to `if (apple_count)`, what's >> the corresponding English for if(node->next)? >> > "If we've the node's next member" If that interpretation works for you, that's fine. It doesn't work for me. What about if (apple_count) vs. if (apple_count != 0) vs. if (apple_count > 0) ? Does the first of those read like English to you? -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"