Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Portable 16 bit binary integer write
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 23:33:20 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <lnmvivtbkf.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <50a1e8f4-4fb3-4491-97d0-54768bf28685@googlegroups.com> <nrf2rf$5ha$1@dont-email.me> <0b757bbb-0494-44cb-bd5a-26f117aaa404@googlegroups.com> <nrgcuu$9hr$1@dont-email.me> <2cf666d7-0755-4c70-adad-07dbafc2b2e7@googlegroups.com> <nrhbt5$l7r$1@dont-email.me> <c9cb703c-db1b-4baa-9622-538aeaca5652@googlegroups.com> <lnk2ebzaxe.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <09cb4413-16a6-4b63-89d0-9dafe56562f6@googlegroups.com> <lnfuozz3ea.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <68e53f3a-5fcc-44fc-90c4-bcf8dc3db680@googlegroups.com> <ln7faayyhf.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <kfnh998fuoa.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <ns02d8$5cl$1@dont-email.me> <kfn60pme9ki.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <ns618u$dub$1@dont-email.me> <26b1209d-868e-49f4-a211-3d0f1019759d@googlegroups.com> <ln7fa1uh4z.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <177ae31d-6836-4448-9edd-339cf95aa974@googlegroups.com> <lnr387tyge.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <86bc2887-c609-4e5a-bcae-cb079945264a@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="4527"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2x2gRTKzaSf7JE3NVucuR"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QF9fyxbv/LpdkJzohbbGfQ9Fwzc= sha1:r8F5rwDmZPe32xXc81vc2cEO29M=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:94070

supercat@casperkitty.com writes:
> On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 5:18:05 PM UTC-5, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Huh?  In what sense do compilers for 64-bit platforms *not* sensibly
>> handle code written for 32-bit int?
>
> The promotion of uint32_t to 64-bit signed int will change the meaning of
> code which uses type uint32_t.
[snip]

My point was that most compilers for 64-bit platforms still make int 32
bits.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"