Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Is this valid C? Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:56:07 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <87shnab3c5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87wpclaoqs.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <4a1d176e-0c60-422e-9eb0-04574b2f32ef@googlegroups.com> <9e683fb3-c692-4777-8e58-6ab23eee68ff@googlegroups.com> <726ddfc8-83af-47db-8a18-08d921816e82@googlegroups.com> <3bee4191-6834-4b99-bf92-d8ca5b8b34e2@googlegroups.com> <68dc7263-0d48-432b-bc08-a6536fda6382@googlegroups.com> <9a61886f-1f50-4b4c-a088-6e378cba9f68@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f3ac9ced70e0b1a54e50b8960e1b8067"; logging-data="15242"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18APJUrmCqHZzbLKWf/o6hl" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2U2T14ZE3mIWYCCxwPIM8dXRI/w= sha1:o3Zo4LPJuS/M5kIg1jGGa7Vt/rk= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:104329 supercat@casperkitty.com writes: [...] > Otherwise, gcc4 is fairly "modern". Do you know where I could find the > documentation for versions in the 1989-1996 era? The documentation is included in the gcc sources, which can be cloned from git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git . The history goes back to 1988. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"