Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: usecases of void foo(char **b) {} Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:24:47 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <5a9aae7f-eb86-4c7b-bc93-142504b1d0a9@googlegroups.com> <49899127-bf04-4a84-a374-5bebfbe7f4f7@googlegroups.com> <8f154274-4b6f-41f3-8489-c94f98e5c559@googlegroups.com> <7e4b6986-cc4c-4638-91cb-a74f36ce4a3a@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="55d562a779fc0ae2b1f2a983cf45db85"; logging-data="7665"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/U1UlqcY/jsNnB3SrTueU0" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NGm8dmv7ClJg4EP47sN0P5ypxhA= sha1:yBiFIMTKLay0wibV14uivUJEkaA= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:95608 BartC writes: > On 02/11/2016 14:02, John Bode wrote: [...] >> Then deal with it. C isn't going to significantly change going forward. > > It certainly won't with the kind of attitudes in this group. Do you understand that changing C's declaration syntax would break essentially all existing C code? Unless you manage to add some new syntax while keeping the existing syntax, which would be far worse than what we have now. Do you think that the members of this newsgroup are preventing C from being changed in the way you want? What you want is a different language. There are plenty of them. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"