Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Reading lines from a file, eliminating CR and LF Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 19:48:56 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <9a6e5204-d031-4070-88cb-8132072c5c68@googlegroups.com> <7285df88-1603-4edb-abba-b9c5e4172d34@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f1ffbb62f7d4ea154aec5923c7307730"; logging-data="18120"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1k3NxTvIpfCFuSAuxA9/G" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bSutXCSauLRJO9FXrqmejij6HZo= sha1:PqOfax+Hfd86ODKOgIw6T2qUU84= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:100948 supercat@casperkitty.com writes: > On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 3:15:23 PM UTC-6, Keith Thompson wrote: >> What "implementation-defined property" are you referring to? If it's >> implementation-defined, there's a specific requirement in the standard >> for the behavior to be documented. > > What terminology would the authors of the Standard use for behaviors which > quality general-purpose implementations should map to defined underlying > platform-behaviors when such behaviors exist, but which would be impractical > to define on some other platforms? Probably "recommended practice". -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"