Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Compiling C project for Windows and Mac OS X (GCC for Linux)
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:25:50 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <lnh9m910hd.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <mtaqif$50r$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d5sbmhF884kU16@mid.individual.net> <mtb0eh$ulf$1@dont-email.me> <mtb3ug$8ul$1@dont-email.me> <6dd2d227-fd27-4616-b1a5-049c7e3c37cb@googlegroups.com> <ln37yel6od.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <77230d0e-fb57-4141-9aaa-db3efdda1ccb@googlegroups.com> <lnlhc6jm3s.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <dc8a1882-32f4-46bb-abd6-55ce770f0971@googlegroups.com> <lnr3lyi0r7.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <a291ffcb-9e8a-414e-93cb-6cbfcf3d9509@googlegroups.com> <ln1tdyhy99.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <8c22fa39-8e38-4c63-804a-b99b198bb1b3@googlegroups.com> <lnsi6egh15.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <uxpKx.143190$zz6.1434@fx04.iad> <mte932$7o4$1@dont-email.me> <55ffca40.4479046@news.xs4all.nl> <133bd5bf-5eb3-4161-997b-65407fd255b1@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="8527"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+pRk6kgvcV2X6N12nCIxOu"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kHZJysg3Yd+kk1FRxyBWRv64Q1c= sha1:YZ+wE3O4lDytgoSN0/qvhCFPfBY=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:71641

Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
> On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 10:14:32 AM UTC+1, Richard Bos wrote:
>> jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote:
>> > Use lcc-win instead :-)
>> 
>> Is it _fully_ conforming out-of-the-box?
>> 
>> Including having no extensions turned on?
>> 
> lcc-win is essentially conforming in default mode. However some
> of the extensions might break carefully contrived by valid
> C programs - there's no easy way round that, as the supposed
> mechanisms for extension are too cumbersome to give to
> an application-level programmer.

If I recall correctly, lcc-win has a "-ansic" (sp?) option intended to
enable C99 conformance.  That suggests it's not conforming by default.
(This is an observation, not a criticism.)

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"