Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: absence of max Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 23:11:22 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <0e1db67d-0ab8-4971-a319-8aa66a40b873@googlegroups.com> <436aadfe-20e5-4349-bdf4-9bac145b0d7e@googlegroups.com> <87oa0zi280.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a5363bb21fe375e056a99c05fd10e589"; logging-data="16729"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QPVTGbPpOl+psmStDcXgg" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FLhpzarIH+hPnD6HHT57GHj3pW0= sha1:oY1ajhRdq25ouGkfX7mjgWb2psw= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:97708 BartC writes: > On 29/11/2016 01:02, supercat@casperkitty.com wrote: [...] >> Given the code: >> >> int a[5]; >> int *b = a+5; >> >> to what object would b point? > > To the value 1638280? (According to one attempt I made to print *b). "the value 1638280" is not an object. [...] > My objection, a few posts back, was about being able to do b[i], or > treating b like an array. To someone coming from a difference language, > that sounds like asking for trouble. To someone who knows C, it's perfectly ordinary. To someone who pretends not to know C, it's an opportunity to whine. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"