Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: The C Containers library
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:24:27 -0800
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <lnfv0k5ph0.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <n11san$o70$1@dont-email.me> <n129pr$ngg$1@news.albasani.net> <ln7fm2936r.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <n1faa7$db4$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="12531"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MqD0XdLpf6askkrOfuWNY"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MytuwF0LDPRyD9TUIujXibgMnq4= sha1:cqgW9tCNsHyguIPZy8V8uL/UABY=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:74989

Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> writes:
> On 31.10.2015 21:46, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>                         Has probably UB (return missing).
>> 
>> If you're referring to the lack of a return statement at the end of
>> main(), that's not an issue.  In C++ (as in C starting with C90),
>> reaching the closing "}" of main() does an implicit `return 0;`.
>
> I was. Thanks for your pointer, learned something new. Interesting!

And in case people have forgotten the correction I posted earlier, this
rule was introduced to C in C99, not C90.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"