Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: GCC vs Clang Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:57:02 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <4p0oqbh4ail533kg8acdg2u1p3n2d47n6f@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="14984"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8vnKzKHMS7duesDrTZNMU" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sSnmZLiNEN2nsb3DK5K0HmPZcb0= sha1:qO1AvJQsymUb3zoPod5R16DdFzY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:92159 jacobnavia writes: > Le 11/08/2016 à 22:11, Keith Thompson a écrit : >> your habit of >> complaining in comp.lang.c about things that are not C language >> issues is not helpful. > C compilers are always on topic here. > > Reason: The compiler is the primary tool for the C language. > > I repeat a previous email that you ignored: Yes, I did. Why would you expect me not to? > 1) You are nobody to say what is on topic here or not. And you are? > 2) C Compilers are OF COURSE on topic and also complaining about them > if somebody feels like. I didn't even say his complaints were off-topic (though I admit that I implied it). I said they were was unhelpful. Do you disagree? Has complaining about Clang Windows installers here solved BartC's problems? So ... your position is that complaining about *any* C compiler is on-topic here? I'll keep that in mind. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"