Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Difference between these pointer syntaxes Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:21:51 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <4628cd2d-9333-4be6-943a-eb593c5c4c12@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="15627"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gYEgKbZYOQNd9vHaInVAk" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:J33A9NVH2BK61JMquwfzcuJ5T0c= sha1:QgWMS3IbqV8oBDK5fitrSSWOky8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:92337 already5chosen@yahoo.com writes: > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 5:20:52 PM UTC+3, Keith Thompson wrote: >> >> Your claim that >> arrays and pointers are the same thing is blatantly incorrect. > > The sentence "C arrays and pointers are the same thing" is incorrect > in fine details. It is incorrect in both fine details and overall concept. > The sentence "C arrays and pointers have nothing in common" is > blatantly incorrect. Yes, it is. So what? I'm not aware that anyone has made such a statement (though some have reacted *as if* somebody had made such a statement). -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"