Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Naming convention for structs and types
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:50:52 -0800
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <lnfukongsz.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <f491ab71-d445-4044-81ac-2819a4726b29@googlegroups.com> <316df0b2-5692-4eff-8ec7-41ad9ff08d17@googlegroups.com> <o58nqd$9p0$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="768745921b79448f5a531b86aeb60d71"; logging-data="31379"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/U4IaTx6iXvi0JtXqcygt"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4scLqj7nDDlSzqz0teOqz5za4JY= sha1:ShpTOTcJnN7HGpkqaH4uJiFSiv0=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:101551

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
> On 12/01/17 20:01, luser droog wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> The trailing _t is actually reserved for the implementation,
>
> Certainly true for int*_t and uint*_t, but do you have a citation for 
> the more general claim?

I think it's a POSIX rule.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"