Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Octal Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:32:53 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <5de6cdd0-6a36-40da-9bd6-4387d43c7947@googlegroups.com> <9cb7833a-8479-4e61-8398-690783c4d975@googlegroups.com> <2v666c9vvvlienafoqpqdk32m56fpv6tph@4ax.com> <2e01e7a5-2ba6-412b-8e38-25f25d3f53cd@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ba0db46df61d502ee0e6afe10bb5a782"; logging-data="32712"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/18s22t2l1O8ZmrnywbQzF" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MiLa2LxqkcXShA09RH4GqD0NtDs= sha1:M9THUf+ZFbiNxqkcOAmmU6+svfU= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:101683 Tim Rentsch writes: [...] >>> supercat writes: >>>> The only thing that erroneously regards 0x123E+4 as a combination of >>>> floating and integer constants is a sloppily-written standard. [...] [...] > Incidentally, let me remind you _again_ that putting a hyphen > between an adverb and a following adjective, like "sloppily" and > "written", is bad usage. Your writing is bad enough, don't > make it worse by having it be ungrammatical. This web page http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/hyphens.asp disagrees, as do I. In my opinion, in this particular case, it's ok with or without the hyphen. Also in my opinion, criticizing English grammar is not constructive. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"