Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Unspecified behavior in C
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:44:17 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <lnd1z3hlou.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <353ff1a5-5e38-4791-9e5b-2c3d6589079c@googlegroups.com> <ln1tgfsu8i.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <37753968-e7fd-4076-9451-ed27b66a7330@googlegroups.com> <lnsi8unscq.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <cbd1f5ff-cad1-4558-855a-980a4691063b@googlegroups.com> <55A2AE38.3010002@verizon.net> <bf532be7-e6e0-4871-a28d-36acc24ce3fa@googlegroups.com> <ln4ml7nalh.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <e8c9dfed-cfa9-4546-9234-47cea2f8f483@googlegroups.com> <mo3949$gjr$1@dont-email.me> <7be04ed7-d12b-41a5-9d9f-7c70b20936ea@googlegroups.com> <mo3dak$1ua$1@dont-email.me> <mo3m0b$4kn$1@dont-email.me> <1622f824-7bca-4214-8768-86abf1c5d867@googlegroups.com> <82f9a602-1177-4a53-bfe6-3be2fa7ac76d@googlegroups.com> <4938af2d-22ef-4887-8538-129ee573557e@googlegroups.com> <mpev80$mfg$1@dont-email.me> <8d3d7a31-90d4-4e81-bdd3-0e82fa5f970a@googlegroups.com> <mpo3k3$ops$1@dont-email.me> <55BFA42D.9000406@verizon.net> <7bac9a68-ea29-4022-9c6d-eb1f9211e130@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="17674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NswGODn3nwNNV1MNlgnEC"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oyAxnOkheAhyCpvAUbPA9gI0Uiw= sha1:dVnLucAfvd4cOgpuzGZXn83NeJM=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:66836

David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> writes:
> On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 10:26:14 AM UTC-7, James Kuyper wrote:
[...]
>    putchar('a') + putchar ('b')
>
> Neat. But what does "final result" mean exactly? They both got printed -
> in what order is of no concern to the program. 

Haven't you been saying that you want the unspecified order of
evaluation of the two operands of "+" to be implementation-defined?

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"