Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Is 'extern' necessary? Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:47:50 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <87vascn13j.fsf@news.bourguet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="224226333e9535e2f06996e59b2311d1"; logging-data="29040"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18U/wp3jbBV/ucRXgYW94IK" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WrOg3sntS3fGzNsZ5tFTdLIVqDU= sha1:+CKS+1+6CulJ+EEKS1C2H3YtHTM= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:103901 Jean-Marc Bourguet writes: > BartC writes: >> Or you finally admitting that perhaps the MingW library /is/ really >> designed to work with gcc? > > They provide a modified gcc to work with Microsoft's C runtime. Most of > the C library used by MinGW for sure was *not* designed to work with gcc. The stdio.h header file BartC quoted is clearly part of MinGW, and apparently was designed specifically to work with MinGW's version of gcc. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"