Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Why _Bool was not defined as enum in C99? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:23:26 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <6b5aa241-0498-4e41-993b-a1ed445effb0@googlegroups.com> <02a1a24e-5ead-486c-8397-e68a2a79f8f7@googlegroups.com> <8760pynx50.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <5180b836-9506-49bf-b1a1-9a540a6c8f9a@googlegroups.com> <45ceb433-9998-4116-8c79-e72821db2d3b@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="29564"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18iv/KLbpPHVnnw1y/MEuwA" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ctrhcB/zL/CEjdz4yn8mIvtl1cc= sha1:7YflD34L31mFAV7qimXquA0aCX0= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:93676 luser droog writes: [...] > At the time I was operating under the rule that headers should not > call other headers. I then had occasion to change my postscript > implementation from C99 to C90 (or 91, more precisely), so stdbool > had to go (for that project). [...] What is C91? -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"