Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: double free
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 14:17:11 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <lna8h8f414.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
References: <d5964270-015f-4955-9f7a-6a06bcfb5944@googlegroups.com> <nm1t9l$94u$1@dont-email.me> <87bn2317dl.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nm2i5n$5e9$1@dont-email.me> <87shvfyrq6.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nm334m$48j$1@dont-email.me> <ln7fcqizl9.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <nm387e$ojp$1@dont-email.me> <kfneg6qyj72.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <nmj35n$usb$1@dont-email.me> <kfnzipbt0st.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <nmr2ff$401$1@dont-email.me> <nmtnkm$ere$1@dont-email.me> <nmtpp3$nga$1@dont-email.me> <ln8twtijg6.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <5793313b.2453031@news.xs4all.nl> <nmvcv1$511$1@dont-email.me> <87fur0acpk.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nmvkrk$rtl$1@dont-email.me> <lntwfgf7zx.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <nn0la6$8e5$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="11359"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19OS9kCtfQ9i5Ljxl0asuOl"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lR/+h4wjvTTm8+zHd/zjyWjZwPA= sha1:jnmMAOsg4V6RBHtBCcHD494fSyA=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:90880

BartC <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
> On 23/07/2016 20:51, Keith Thompson wrote:
[...]
>> I do not recall Tim saying that this implies one should not use
>> parentheses for clarity.  Do you?
>
> He said (referring to knowing all binary op precedence levels):
>
> "I would.  And do.  And happy to do it.  If you can't take
> the heat, stay out of the kitchen."
>
> So he knows exactly what every expression means, and suggests that only 
> those who also know all the levels should be coding. So why would anyone 
> need extra parentheses? Either something is already clear, or you 
> shouldn't be programming.

Was that intended to answer my question?  I believe you are inferring
things he didn't say.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"