Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: GCC vs Clang Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:35:12 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="26564"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/IMESV0huBmzTz/kSOJ34" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kgkN6oXcMGYerZUUIWLM9wvoXN0= sha1:GCV8gHCObOmUif8Le/ujXzmCgT8= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:90859 The Doctor writes: > Which is the better compiler? > > Also are there any [other] C / C++ compilers? [typo corrected in quoted text] There are a lot of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compilers#C_compilers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compilers#C.2B.2B_compilers (I note that the list of C compilers does not include lcc-win. Presumably it should. Be prepared for jacob to be greatly offended because I mentioned this.) Please keep in mind that C and C++ are two different languages; there is no "C/C++ language". (C++ is almost but not quite a superset of C.) -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"