Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Using fread function Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:45:21 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <02c75a0c-84d7-4669-8bde-472730c7f8d3@googlegroups.com> <79af9f0c-d7e1-ef68-d186-f1ce0baa9e6c@verizon.net> <05a6afe0-d7db-4877-a244-1c5c7bc8e928@googlegroups.com> <28dc26c8-8063-4334-9850-b1a5ba7876f3@googlegroups.com> <771b708b-a48b-4fde-87c1-79bbd7e2676c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9029eb194d173f90c26f49eb1843bbfe"; logging-data="24003"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pQh4E9Is0LNLBAfsnwK70" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:QSWaLmOkzsoXaQzKgnwrNkDUcYI= sha1:wDxOgMzjzFjV9CGMRscup5TBvZw= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:104286 supercat@casperkitty.com writes: [...] > So again, I ask, what do you mean by a "Standard C program"? Or, to > put it another way, what must a collection of source text do, and > refrain from doing, to qualify as a "Standard C program"? As far as I can tell, the first use of the phrase "Standard C program" is in the article to which I'm replying. I suggest you figure out who who, if anyone, actually used that phrase and ask them. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"