Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Difference between these pointer syntaxes Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:10:02 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="6553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+KV5f6rdEdL/AtGM1e6ckM" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PfcOZ5VsneYqqUhuu0sRhvhN5uw= sha1:oUWtJH0qy9+8RSqKlKEJC2Zvb34= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:92341 BartC writes: [...] > This is why a list of pitfalls can be more important than constantly > having the entire set of array/pointer interactions in your mind. Fine, I find it easier to start with an understanding of how they interact, but it's your call. All I ask at this point is that you stop trying to explain array/pointer interactions to others. If you find yourself saying that arrays and pointers are "the same", you've got it wrong, and you should avoid confusing others. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"