Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: GCC vs Clang Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:22:53 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="29928"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LPH+DBLfyJp4GHpufw9ik" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uJIKsrjNxyac+vb2/5h8SnfvLJw= sha1:C9uy+cPtUnkF4zMm4M5XvQsdTHg= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:90810 [The OP tried to cross-post to comp.lang.c and comp.lang.c++, but mistyped the latter as "comp.lang,c++". This followup goes only to comp.lang.c.] jacobnavia writes: > Le 22/07/2016 à 19:29, The Doctor a écrit : >> Which is the better compiler? >> >> Also are there any toher C / C++ compilers? > > A free C compiler for windows platforms: > > http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32 > > 64 bit compiler (C99 mostly) with 128 bit integers, many extra numeric > types like qfloats (480 bit floats) bignums, etc > > Fast compiler but approx 60-70% of fully optimized gcc only. > > Source code available at request (not free) > Compiler binaries are free. And quoting the web page: This software is not freeware, it is copyrighted by Jacob Navia. It's free for **non-commercial** use, if you use it professionally you have to have to buy a licence. (jacob, you might want to delete the extraneous "have to" there.) (I apologize for my newsreaders poor treatment of non-ASCII characters.) -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"