Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Octal Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:24:23 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <3500f98c-6317-47bb-b703-c1530496ba93@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8719ec07cc9cf870a68c352ae34a5c70"; logging-data="6389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19B75Yg12ZZRJcPH/CsxxBT" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Qcc/OMhc+3AZnZF00tSpFJ7yXKQ= sha1:VO2V3KX7+tTFx0ZYKV9hvDUYUKU= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:100823 Malcolm McLean writes: > On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 8:38:37 PM UTC, Ian Collins wrote: >> it includes the note: >> >> "Parameter names may be omitted only if the parameter is unused and its >> purpose is obvious." >> > Kind of an oxymoron. If a parameter is used, its purpose can often > be obvious. But if it is unused, there must always be the question > why it was included. Yes, and sometimes the answer to that question might be obvious. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"