Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Octal
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 09:02:13 +1300
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <ect5i5Fq0soU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <o3tsi4$es8$1@dont-email.me> <o3u96r$t9f$1@dont-email.me> <lnmvfh6s9t.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <o3uqga$1g2$1@dont-email.me> <o43tve$cuv$1@dont-email.me> <o45f38$qo6$1@dont-email.me> <o45ltq$h8n$1@dont-email.me> <o45p7b$soo$1@dont-email.me> <o45vv9$mtk$1@dont-email.me> <o4b5fm$ul5$1@dont-email.me> <ect3siFq0soU1@mid.individual.net> <clang-20170101205038@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 0/FglSlHAoyChTeqo4DWFQxTtHNItzBFDbwM7UcjvWjtt2wdZl
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g+smE3BPs4KMjopnSyf9z+9WWLI=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
In-Reply-To: <clang-20170101205038@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:100807

On 01/ 2/17 08:54 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes:
>> I wonder why C hasn't adopted the simple rule from C++: if a parameter
>> isn't going to be used, don't give it a name.
>
>    There's a style checker for C++ in clang, and when I write:
>
> int f( int ){}
>
>    , it tells me:
>
> warning: all parameters should be named in a function
> [readability-named-parameter]

It should be telling that control reaches end of non-void function...

cat /tmp/x.cc; clang++ -c /tmp/x.cc -Wall -Wextra; clang++ --version
int f( int ) { return 0; }

void g( int ) {}
clang version 4.0.0-svn287013-1~exp1 (trunk)

-- 
Ian