Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: absence of max
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 14:34:59 +1300
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <eaha63FkmtmU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <0e1db67d-0ab8-4971-a319-8aa66a40b873@googlegroups.com> <lnzikf5q3u.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <ad3c58b4-fe15-4ace-b499-4e1972a674b2@googlegroups.com> <829f496b-0f0d-408c-82b3-8be2bd5775d7@googlegroups.com> <2bba48cd-e2c6-44f1-bce9-eff26acbba50@googlegroups.com> <o1s54c$ioe$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <37a4c69f-07eb-4e03-b548-7348629e6b3c@googlegroups.com> <o1slkk$j9i$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <71c8962e-b06e-44a5-8bda-a79d8cda48e5@googlegroups.com> <o1t3om$5ii$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <o1t610$b5m$1@dont-email.me> <o1t860$fui$2@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <87y3zxkbhj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <o1taft$d18$2@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <87lgvxk9oo.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <o1tf23$ojl$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <o1u8vp$qbr$1@dont-email.me> <o1vasg$gbj$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <796d7fbf-c6c8-47f2-89e4-7c28da0c905a@googlegroups.com> <o1vqso$3in$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <o1vrcj$5n1$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net V/SAloIFhZYiMOjVXmhRWQ1rFhVo4u3y8CPISRRhXu5EQnSbBA
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/QzlMFxj9veOO9waK35D47pkN6s=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
In-Reply-To: <o1vrcj$5n1$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:97968

On 12/ 4/16 02:28 PM, BartC wrote:
> On 04/12/2016 01:19, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> Gee, no shit, Sherlock.  You miss the entire point.
>>
>> But that's pretty normal for you.
>
>
> Why don't you just admit you were mistaken when you said, about bar and
> boz in this code fragment when 'thing' is an array typedef:
>
>
>       int foo(thing bar)
>       {
>         thing boz;
>         ...
>       }
>
> that:
>
>   > They will have exactly the same type.
>
> ?

Because he never does.  The closest he gets to admitting he is wrong 
will be a childish insult.

-- 
Ian