Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Breakthrough
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:23:56 +1200
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <a34qrtFu5cU5@mid.individual.net>
References: <jqi6o4$gqf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jqi95i$mmp$1@news.albasani.net> <jqikei$spb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrn3vfsjsplvp.rdg.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> <jqim7o$28f$2@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net vvRAMbMo6nrlep4VOHwF+QZwLzax/MJpqsfn55bnTwvn2FyDP79Q4S4MiugCGHskDW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aHYP82zAnKb7teK7CWKnFyBOm6k=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120423 Thunderbird/12.0
In-Reply-To: <jqim7o$28f$2@speranza.aioe.org>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:21838 comp.lang.c++:16631

On 06/ 5/12 04:03 AM, jacob navia wrote:
> Le 04/06/12 17:44, Ike Naar a écrit :
>>
>> On the machine that I tried, most of the time was spent on the
>> implicit destruction of the list at program termination.
>
> Yes, I see a noticeable delay between the printing of the
> result sum and the end of the program.
>
> Apparently cleaning up is quit e expensive since destructors must be
> called 100 million times.
>
> In the CCL you can ADD a destructor if you want but they are NOT
> required as in C++.

So not leaking memory is optional :)

-- 
Ian Collins