Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 06:34:23 -0600 From: Gareth Owen Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar References: <49bb22bc-7863-4b60-9685-4706e4df93eb@googlegroups.com> <70398b95-088c-4936-9073-aafcb872d892@googlegroups.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:34:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87zikx6k6p.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6tMKqn0rMUC2un3qLCvKCRPR9gM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 32 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-Nxxym3KooYBDJK91G5gPzDE6/YcLJ8wo6HU7FFKDlvjyzTgTmijkCndFVHyDbTF3qcp7NY0bCXOGXLD!MQckmpKIoPtRkjEpz+0cc7XT0KV51HDqQrMC3/U+leoDprI4tZ+kllPzIy5fajRA+QJC X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2933 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:96812 David Brown writes: >> I wrote the C containers library and an EXTENSIVE TECHNICAL >> DESCRIPTION of all the specs and code that I published. Look at the >> PDF file and you will see what I consider a technical documentation. > > The CCL documentation (I recommend you use the hyperref package when > generating the pdf - it will give the pdf a proper table of contents > and clickable links. Other than that, the document looks very > impressive) is a mixture of a tutorial on CCL and a reference for how > to use the library. gcc does not come with a reference on the > programming languages it implements (the ISO standards, or their > drafts, are available elsewhere), nor is it a tutorial on C > programming. No, it does not. But some equally awful terrible very-bad free software people do maintain CPP reference (http://en.cppreference.com/) which documents the C++ standard library every bit as well as Jacob documents his library. And of course, its fatuous to compare the quality of documentation for a library (which is absolutely crucial for library end users) and the documentation of the internals of a compiler (which is utterly irrelevant for compiler users). And, of course, whether the documentation for the internals of LCC is good or not is even more irrelevant, only a very small number of people needs to see it, wishes to see it, or is allowed to see it. The documentation for writing a new front-end for gcc may be deficient, but its *still* easier for me to write a new front-end for gcc than it is to write one for lcc.