Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:13:06 -0500
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: What if pre-processor was moved to parser?
References: <11c906d6-9be0-44df-82b4-157fdba3b91c@googlegroups.com> <egnq1dFht9oU2@mid.individual.net> <20170217120120.b9bbf85eda05d8bda121396a@gmail.com> <egovvrF7ke0U1@mid.individual.net> <20170217201227.93e1b5cd23e83e7c007cac84@gmail.com> <egpabpF7ke0U2@mid.individual.net> <o87ttq$mh3$1@dont-email.me> <20170218011807.0d1e068b6ecd4344fc3ec5b0@gmail.com> <egpigfF7ke0U7@mid.individual.net> <20170218014557.a7fad1b05918af2c44f6db6d@gmail.com> <egpsncF7ke0U8@mid.individual.net> <o88sf8$ug7$1@dont-email.me> <egqbglF7ke0U10@mid.individual.net> <kfn8tovtscq.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <ehbijtF5ugU2@mid.individual.net> <kfn8tmn5msi.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <emchvcFkt88U1@mid.individual.net> <odsbqh$dli$1@dont-email.me> <bf9ef2e2-6cd3-4719-8281-bf9830d5c7bf@googlegroups.com> <emds32Fkt88U7@mid.individual.net> <slrn3vfsog46d6.ap4.ike@iceland.freeshell.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:13:06 +0100
Message-ID: <87zif1ra6l.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dWt/81ZtbkHwXSRfb89OvIf20ko=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 11
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-yDNADvFUQGO+gEFEJGjouuBGC5FGmwCP/HHX69WfMlSbHKGa5M15BJbZ664nc3k/E8tHUz1kL7duTxm!ZvnZWBZd+Ew6COIAAzV5hP4MyjaWBUCSVSyEpy/f7i5vJcpAibdQ3VXosMff8aWMLYAMSKM=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2103
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:108615

Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> writes:

> x++ has the side effect of incrementing x, so, in the end, x is
> better than x++ !

C++ will be C with extras, once its finished...

> Perhaps x+1 would be a more appropriate name for "x with extras" than
> x++ would be.

:)