Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 09:58:56 -0500
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded
References: <5ae847c6-461f-4243-86bb-5712b158b022@googlegroups.com> <ln628aiw2v.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <d65cee92-f2b1-4ec1-a642-0b44ed84f7b7@googlegroups.com> <slrnk3h5d6.ph6.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <736f5601-6e86-495d-9a4a-bd4da6c077bf@googlegroups.com> <k1a91n$lva$1@news.albasani.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:59:06 +0100
Message-ID: <87vcg7dnlx.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HhuOkylpvEsYpLBGkJhvPi0MXAI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines: 9
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-XELYP0hlIU0QqZ1mAMbZoizuz+L9pYd5KCWIj0824It2zGIQXRqOzkQ+FCVeQrKMd6GGur9jHQ43YFz!tR2Tys5Ti1oQ65/2TK6TNCleYgXn6Qf3ltTazqgJSWLUOG0uXAvoVFBR2GuLkLpkjwNSmg==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1567
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:24915

Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> writes:

> On 25.08.2012 12:07, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>
> This isn't mere pedanticism ("new" keyword, etc.), but the bare truth:
> Some constructs which are necessary for embedded systems are just syntax
> errors in C++, while they work perfectly in C.

Could you give an example or three?