Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:21:08 -0500
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: usecases of void foo(char **b) {}
References: <f04d8120-e4c9-464b-923c-7dc262da5b5b@googlegroups.com> <bc31d2f8-1b50-4ab8-bf70-e9c61f510735@googlegroups.com> <nv8l1m$2oq$1@dont-email.me> <2bf83e98-eb96-4ab6-b1ca-4e6a8bd824f5@googlegroups.com> <5b33a608-8f61-4ea0-be08-080018f5772c@googlegroups.com> <nv8r1c$i54$1@dont-email.me> <87mvhjo3jw.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nv9ubc$7uf$1@dont-email.me> <b4a396b5-48ff-485e-845b-dca9c66de64c@googlegroups.com> <lneg2v42t8.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <3a09f5ec-d4f7-40fa-9855-b5c3f02ce4e9@googlegroups.com> <87ziljks6k.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <2199a2dd-d844-4f8d-bfe0-6a7c2854277b@googlegroups.com> <87twbqlsin.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nvbaii$arc$1@dont-email.me> <87oa1yljof.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nvcdp8$rvt$1@dont-email.me> <87ins5k15t.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nvdv04$g49$1@dont-email.me> <87bmxxm6zs.fsf@gmail.com> <nvf4ra$dk0$1@dont-email.me>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:21:08 +0000
Message-ID: <87r36stivf.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TnmMFDWzXcwC1pqlgbjd5nvG2dk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 15
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-CmjJ33/tVQsehUc19a/Lj4N0GOfvBTIgIC+5D+gg12vHH3v75HopZb6FHhE9Su6o9mQiybHyhxy6Zx6!2PQQt7Up8ufj3JWZLACeYCveOUCNPEck7CI7X+hT2y8G7AR8CVejQOZYZMdkc2K37DTG
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2141
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:95691

BartC <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

> On 03/11/2016 06:07, Gareth Owen wrote:
>> BartC <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>>
>>> I am not however spreading disinformation just because my view of C is
>>> wider than your narrow one.
>>
>> Have you considered, even for a second, the possibility that you might
>> be wrong?
>>
>
> Go back and show me what I said that was wrong.

That doesn't answer the question.