Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:24:30 -0500
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth
References: <6c40cc35-7933-4fdb-9f65-8d5db74ac551@googlegroups.com> <nq5au8$i5a$1@dont-email.me> <nq74nf$t2l$1@dont-email.me> <nq76k3$4c3$1@dont-email.me> <d1a35690-3576-4482-afa7-28de7130650c@googlegroups.com> <nqdcm7$4r7$1@dont-email.me> <nqduqa$dee$1@dont-email.me> <nqf4mk$53m$1@dont-email.me> <nqf527$6op$1@dont-email.me> <nqp9iu$h4p$1@dont-email.me> <nqpad5$k73$1@dont-email.me> <nqpc39$obb$2@dont-email.me> <87h99rwv06.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nqpfm0$8ia$3@dont-email.me> <nqs3k5$d74$2@dont-email.me> <nqs4f2$i24$1@dont-email.me> <nqss5f$9hi$1@dont-email.me> <87bmzx63fd.fsf@gmail.com> <nr7is4$o4m$1@dont-email.me>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 06:24:29 +0100
Message-ID: <87poo8gynm.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kdmUqPPQXU/PWjM1vJO9urkNLrw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 16
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-ZGij0dluA4Al2FpbloGseNXhXkhaKgnK8B/PtHWRvOpyGmKToGEvMJFBcZCUv1hcZFkgoJaB0FQNEGc!uilf9yW1XaQCKnTILAUSxU8N/zcApt5T0jAqqWlPa2tZz8TZHfWUCudr/ItQxp++Hw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2170
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:93409

Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> writes:

> On 9/9/2016 12:35 AM, Gareth Owen wrote:
>> Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> It's false in the complex numbers (for example, a = 3, b = 3, c = 3 *
>>> cuberoot of 2 is a solution to a^3 + b^3 = c^3.)
>>
>> They're not complex numbers. They're real numbers - and I think its safe
>> to say that FLT is not true over the reals.\
>
> Any counter example in the real numbers is also a counter example in
> the complex numbers.

I understood that (correctly) that when writing "complex numbers" in
this context the author meant "Gaussian integers"