Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 01:11:24 -0500
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Small Device C Compiler 3.6.0 released
References: <nk0phh$v39$1@dont-email.me> <6516ac44-70bf-4f7d-99fb-cb08b966dc05@googlegroups.com> <nk0t07$bma$1@dont-email.me> <68ca1d97-7488-4d21-9127-4d5c20317553@googlegroups.com> <nk2db4$d4s$1@dont-email.me> <cb471db4-0e94-41ee-b733-86e0bc9da2be@googlegroups.com> <nk412i$fm2$1@dont-email.me> <5ee03b84-c17c-49f4-ae5d-5b7bd705d464@googlegroups.com> <nk52bj$lam$1@dont-email.me> <f89d43db-b510-477f-b11e-652b55dc1fa1@googlegroups.com> <nk59tt$64n$1@dont-email.me> <85sjnbl85aqiccn760lvd6ba5gs8alqr91@4ax.com> <nle5a0$cnp$1@dont-email.me> <72933000-a72d-4089-933d-90ff1d2d3b53@googlegroups.com> <nlebdh$7j6$1@dont-email.me> <2c8ffe2c-2951-43eb-89db-36ba2453a825@googlegroups.com> <nlf9hd$hhm$1@dont-email.me>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 07:11:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87inwkwr5f.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JxK229LML/8odjQsPtrI7J1JLQY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 15
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-YzzlEsJn4gdLImgMVeI8ceogrZE0f28eDPGtjF68EZQNlk2qgE8gAoaOmKc6tHiqV44uC0roEUqqc8a!eW8o5ry2TMe/n7kKFqeyybfbg5UXtMb48nxnAMLb0ll6X24fSK1E9OhY01rA1lRz+mE=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2185
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:90016

Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> writes:

> On 7/4/2016 6:03 PM, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>> On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 7:54:54 PM UTC+1, Martin Shobe wrote:
>>> On 7/4/2016 12:52 PM, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>>>
>>> This appears to contradict the claim you made that was under contention.
>>> As a reminder, you claimed that the following restriction followed from
>>> the single entry/exit restriction. Are you now retracting that claim?
>>>
>> Elaborating on it.
>
> Your elaboration appears to contradict it.

Colour me amazed.